Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Final verdict, local RWA meeting...

  • Jun. 20th, 2009 at 4:27 PM
Sword
ETA: I just wanted to say that I certainly don't believe this is how all, or even most, of the chapters of this organization act--just this one on this particular day. So I'll definitely be investigating other chapters, in hopes of finding a better fit. ;o)

So here's how it went down.

11:50 Arrived a meeting room. 3 ladies inside, eating their lunches. (Web-site makes clear this is normal) I asked if it was the RWA meeting, they said yes. I sat down (in the chair next to them (it was a long table)), they continued to talk among themselves.

By 1:00 about 16 members are there. No one has asked me who I am, what I'm doing there, or if I'm interested in joining. No one has initiated any speech with me. One person gave me her first name after I tried to introduce myself.

The lecture subject is about setting up webpages, using FrontPage (which I already know thanks to OK TechMasters). Not a real challenge for me, but it is for many of the members. I am sitting at a table near the center of the room. Alone.

The lecture is supposed to go from 1-2. Because some members came later, it essentially starts at 1:30. I read ahead in the instructions, because I've pretty much done all this before. After 2, members start leaving. I pack up at 3, since I've been there 3 hours and no one's spoken to me. (To be perfectly fair, there have been a few off the cuff comments, such as the woman who told me her computer uses Linux, so this wasn't helpful for her.)

However, I left that place with only one person knowing my name (I actually doubt she'll remember), and none knowing whether I was a writer (or reporter for a seamy tabloid), or whether I wanted to join their organization.

Just not feeling the love...I doubt I'll bother to go back...

(On the upside, I did get some work done on story outlines, and blogged with some cool people while the others were trying to get their software to load ;o)

Comments

( 41 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]incandragon wrote:
Jun. 20th, 2009 09:48 pm (UTC)
Oh dear. I've been to a few gatherings like that. Unpleasant and disappointing.
[info]j_cheney wrote:
Jun. 20th, 2009 09:54 pm (UTC)
Just so...
[info]marshallpayne1 wrote:
Jun. 20th, 2009 09:51 pm (UTC)
Sorry it wasn't what you hoped for. Still, I enjoyed your "day at the races" from my vicarious browser-side view. Thanks for taking us along. ;o)
[info]j_cheney wrote:
Jun. 20th, 2009 09:55 pm (UTC)
It was more entertaining than sitting around and being ignored ;o)
[info]jongibbs wrote:
Jun. 20th, 2009 10:35 pm (UTC)
Me too. Sorry it didn't work out. I'd say it's their loss :)
[info]j_cheney wrote:
Jun. 20th, 2009 10:50 pm (UTC)
Ah, they're probably just full up ;o)
[info]jongibbs wrote:
Jun. 20th, 2009 10:55 pm (UTC)
From what you described, I'd say 'stuck up'.
[info]j_cheney wrote:
Jun. 21st, 2009 12:08 pm (UTC)
Just non-inclusive ;o)
[info]displacedtexan wrote:
Jun. 20th, 2009 10:01 pm (UTC)
How very "RWA meets Twilight Zone".
[info]j_cheney wrote:
Jun. 20th, 2009 10:50 pm (UTC)
Very true ;o)
[info]jongibbs wrote:
Jun. 25th, 2009 02:55 pm (UTC)
I was thinking 'RWA meets The Jerk[s]' :)
[info]time_shark wrote:
Jun. 20th, 2009 11:09 pm (UTC)
Yipes...
[info]j_cheney wrote:
Jun. 21st, 2009 12:02 pm (UTC)
I suppose what strikes me as most odd is that they showed no curiosity about this person with a rather large computer bag that could have held a handgun, a pipe bomb, or a camera. (What do Romance Writers do in their secret meetings? Enquirer tells all!)

That total lack of curiosity in a closed room is...just strange.
[info]alaneer wrote:
Jun. 21st, 2009 12:10 am (UTC)
That's just, well . . . so disappointing. I should've thought romance writers were friendly and inclusive. Maybe they've spent all the love on their novels already.
[info]j_cheney wrote:
Jun. 21st, 2009 11:58 am (UTC)
What an interesting concept ;o)

This is, I should point out, an isolated group, so I'm not going to think this applies to all RWA. This just means I won't be joining the local chapter. I'll investigate some of the regional ones.
[info]threeoutside wrote:
Jun. 21st, 2009 12:18 am (UTC)
I've never gone to an RWA meeting but I've heard via layers of friends & their friends that this is typical.

I bet you use the experience in something you write someday. Have fun with it. ;^>
[info]j_cheney wrote:
Jun. 21st, 2009 11:56 am (UTC)
I have heard that some RWA groups are wonderful, though, so I'm thinking this one must have been an exception. I suspect it also would help if I had someone to 'usher me in' to the group. Which I didn't.
[info]chris_s_owens wrote:
Jun. 21st, 2009 02:07 am (UTC)
Alas, 3+ hours of your life(that you couldn't been writing) that you'll never get back...
[info]j_cheney wrote:
Jun. 21st, 2009 11:55 am (UTC)
Well, it wasn't all bad. It serves as a refresher on FrontPage, I got some outlining done, and blogged some. ;o) SO not a total loss...
[info]satimaflavell wrote:
Jun. 21st, 2009 03:35 am (UTC)
Some groups are simply a closed shop and don't welcome new members. Definitely their loss.
[info]j_cheney wrote:
Jun. 21st, 2009 11:54 am (UTC)
That's more or less what I've decided. They just aren't that into me ;o)
[info]orogeny wrote:
Jun. 21st, 2009 07:58 am (UTC)
Ow! What a crappy situation. Sounds like you handled it with grace, though, so go, you.
[info]j_cheney wrote:
Jun. 21st, 2009 11:53 am (UTC)
It might have been an exceptional situation, or something like that...but it was really just sort of surreal...
[info]jtglover wrote:
Jun. 21st, 2009 12:30 pm (UTC)
Sorry to hear abut the unpleasant visit. Their loss!
[info]j_cheney wrote:
Jun. 21st, 2009 12:57 pm (UTC)
Wasn't neccesarily unpleasant, so much as mystifying ;o)
[info]babarnett wrote:
Jun. 21st, 2009 05:01 pm (UTC)
Well that's just odd, and kind of rude.
[info]j_cheney wrote:
Jun. 21st, 2009 05:32 pm (UTC)
Odd is the right word. I can't imagine being in a small group, and not showing any curiosity about a stranger in our midst....It's harder for me to imagine that there would be 16/16 people like that.
[info]kmarkhoover wrote:
Jun. 21st, 2009 06:01 pm (UTC)
ugh
Sounds like a horrible experience. You're better of without them. Frankly, from what you've written, they don't deserve you...or anyone else who might like to join their goddamn little writing cloister.

[info]j_cheney wrote:
Jun. 21st, 2009 06:38 pm (UTC)
Re: ugh
I've seriously heard good things about some of the other RWA chapters, and am still interested in investigating them. I just think that there's little chance this chapter would ever be a fit....
[info]kaiweilau wrote:
Jun. 22nd, 2009 02:56 am (UTC)
That's ridiculous. I didn't have anyone to shephard me into RWA and my first meeting was much different. Seems like your local chapter is a definite skip. Though currently, I'm a national member, w/o a local (after moving to Japan, I left my local). I haven't decided if I'm going to join up with another local.
[info]j_cheney wrote:
Jun. 22nd, 2009 02:41 pm (UTC)
Yeah, I definitely think this was an aspect of the local rather than the national, since I've rreally heard good things about thee organization nationally.

I've been told I can come down to meet with a North Texas group, but that's 3 hours each way, so it's not an optimal choice. I was hoping the local would work out, but Texas is looking pretty good right now...
[info]kaiweilau wrote:
Jun. 22nd, 2009 04:50 pm (UTC)
In all honesty, after a certain point, I don't know if joining the local chapters is much help. it's definitely useful to be a member to the National though.
[info]j_cheney wrote:
Jun. 22nd, 2009 06:33 pm (UTC)
I'll keep that in mind ;o) I'll probably join, one way or another...
[info]hildebabble wrote:
Jun. 22nd, 2009 02:05 pm (UTC)
"I sat down (in the chair next to them (it was a long table)), they continued to talk among themselves."

Awwwwwkward.
[info]j_cheney wrote:
Jun. 22nd, 2009 02:39 pm (UTC)
So true ;o)
[info]tchernabyelo wrote:
Jun. 25th, 2009 05:29 pm (UTC)
Are you sure you weren't wearing your cloak of invisibility?

It's very odd. I could entirely believe this if you were in England, but in the US it seems astonishing.
[info]j_cheney wrote:
Jun. 25th, 2009 05:35 pm (UTC)
And Oklahomans aren't known for being shy or standoffish. ;o)

I think the part that was oddest was that in the group there wasn't a single person who was curious enough to take the initiative to talk to me.
[info]shalanna wrote:
Jun. 25th, 2009 08:11 pm (UTC)
How far would you have to drive to NT?
I can relate to your scenario. It's just like that at DARA (Dallas Area Romance Authors) unless you are Someone Important or Famous. I've tried to break into their clique many times, at regular meetings and at conferences, but I am not pretty enough and the kids turn their backs and won't let me sit at their lunch tables. Oops, I mean they sort of just raise one eyebrow when I introduce myself and turn away. It's typical of people who know you're UNPUBLISHED and YOU HAVE COOTIES, I suppose. I get this at national conventions all the time, as well. I approach a group who's sitting or standing, listen to them talking among themselves, smile and maybe try to say something, and they look surprised, close ranks, and usually edge away. How dare some WEIRDO, some STALKER, some UGLY B**CH try to cut in on their Private Conversation! It's endemic. I used to think it was just cheerleaders who did this, but it's any group. That's just human nature.

Now, if you entered a group and got ignored but were later revealed to be someone With Influence, they would be falling all over you! I've always wished I could be invited as the speaker to a group and then I could arrive quietly and get treated the way I'm always treated and THEN when they are looking for the speaker . . . I could walk up to the podium. Then they might realize that they're missing something with EVERY person they snub. You might not have experienced this phenom yet if you're young and pretty . . . things used to be different for me, too, while I was between the ages of sixteen (when I threw off the shackles of pubescent Chelsea Clinton-awkward looks and became normal-girl-looking) and twenty-five (when I got fat and became invisible to most everybody again). People react well to the pretty young girl type (and sometimes to the kindly old lady type--my mother can sometimes still charm her way in by being the Grandma that they remember). Otherwise, unless you can help their careers, you can pretty much bug off. The group is not interested. And this goes for groups of ANYone--not just writers. Geeks, teachers, mechanics . . . doesn't matter. Other people are Not One Of Us.

Sad, but that's the way it is. So if you were told about DARA, for example, don't waste your time running down to DARA meetings here in Richardson *unless* there is someone who is already in the group and who is going to be watching for you. She/he might be your entree into the clique. That could work! There's a North Texas group that meets in the mid-cities somewhere that might be more friendly, and there's NETWO in East Texas, but I would not hold my breath about being welcomed to DARA. (I say this so you won't get all excited and waste your gas money and time. Then again, perhaps it is just my personal stink as a pariah which affected me, and you might do very well with them. Depends on a lot of factors.)
[info]j_cheney wrote:
Jun. 25th, 2009 09:14 pm (UTC)
Re: How far would you have to drive to NT?
It's about 3 hours. The North Texas group I was thinking about isn't DARA, and I do know a couple of people in it, so that might help.

Sorry that they gave you a rough time. I think mine was just a total lack of curiosity, not an intentional snub. I'm sort of middle-aged blah, so not young and pretty, unfortunately, and I think I have one of those faces that makes people assume I'm not going to steal their children, so they tend not to question me too much. (Note to self: Stealing children probably not profitable.)

I suspect that it's also strange since I'm a spec-fic writer, so I've never hung with the romance people before. They don't really care if you're a pro by SFWA standards, I suspect. ;o)

But I have a fantasy/romance novella coming out this fall, so I'm hoping to access the RWA to find out how to promote it on that side of the river. So I'll keep hunting and pecking until I can find a better fit than that one ;o)

[info]shalanna wrote:
Jun. 25th, 2009 08:16 pm (UTC)
Oh, and also--
I'm sure that many people will read my entry and shrug it off as being "what happens to YOU because YOU act funny" or something. Or they'll think I give a dang particularly what happens to DARA or whichever group. But unless a group has someone who acts as a greeter or makes some kind of attempt to integrate newbies into the group, this is what will happen. When I was in the Plano Amateur Radio Club, I acted as an unofficial greeter at meetings and at our Friday night gatherings at a local buffet restaurant. (There was another person who also did this.) People seemed amazed that we wanted to welcome them to PARK. Where I used to go to church, there were also people who kept an eye out for newcomers--not just at the Sunday school classes, where it was easy to spot the new people, but also at services. It was so much better to let people know that we welcomed them, rather than to have them trying to get someone to be nice to them. But those groups have a vested interest in gaining more members, whereas the writers' groups don't really care (in my experience). So be it. Whatever. It's up to them, of course.

If you ever DO find a writing group that has an official or unofficial greeter, be sure to tell them what a difference it makes. Maybe that's the problem . . . these other groups found it wasn't "worth their while" to court newcomers, for whatever reason. So they . . . don't.
[info]j_cheney wrote:
Jun. 25th, 2009 09:18 pm (UTC)
Re: Oh, and also--
That's a really good point, because the thing that really struck me about this situation was that none of them took the iniative to find out who I was. Greeters do it as their job, whereas I have to wonder if each of those 16 women thought I'd come as a guest of one of the other 15, and therefore was automatically OK.

It was a farly strong indicator to me that they weren't interested in new members. Which is OK--that's their prerogative--but they should probably take the comments that say people can visit their meetings off their website...

Edited at 2009-06-25 09:18 pm (UTC)
( 41 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

December 2009
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Paulina Bozek