Previous Entry Add to Memories Share Next Entry
The Golden City
j_cheney

Publication Process: Awards

Many long years ago, I purchased a paperback copy of "Downbelow Station". On the cover there appeared a note that said "Hugo Award Winning..." I figured that was good, but it didn't affect whether or not I was going to buy that novel. I was buying everything by C. J. Cherryh.

That award meant nothing to me. And back then, there wasn't even Wikipedia so I could go look it up. It was just some name that told me there was an award attached to the book. As it was, I read the first 100 pages of the book and put it up in my closet because...well, I thought it was kinda boring. (I'll finish this story at the bottom.)

Lately we've been having a side-discussion in one of my writer groups about the awards and what they mean--or don't mean. You know, the HugosNebulasCampbellCampbellSturgeonEtc. Awards.

Like most of the people in the group, I strongly suspect that most readers don't have any clue what the source of each of those awards is.

When I was a panelist at one con on a panel about Awards, I asked the audience if they knew the difference between all the awards. As I recall, no one raised their hand. And this was the audience at a scifi con (and a rather literary one, to boot) who should have some clue.

I'm not going to bore you by going into the differences here. If you want to know, go look at Wikipedia. My point is that awards -do- have their merit. Even if someone doesn't know where the award came from, who nominated or who voted, or how many of the awards were given out, they still tend to see the 'award' as an indicator of value.

Given, there IS a scale there. Today on my FB, a book cover popped up with a big gold badge that said 'Indie Book of the Year' Semi-Finalist. I know that's not a Newberry Award, even if they have the same gold sticker. I know the difference between the Pulitzer Prize and the Pritzger Prize.

But I suspect the vast majority of readers don't know the difference between the John W. Campbell Memorial Award and the John W. Campbell Award. I suspect the vast majority doesn't even know that there -are- two different Campbell Awards at all.

Just something to think about...

(I am, BTW, not slamming on awards. I like awards. I want one. Someday.)


_______________________________
*I did pick up that book again about a month later....and read the rest of it in one sitting, which is impressive since it was a 700-page book. It was that good. I just had to get over the hump. And then? Wow!

I don't buy books based on awards or even know a lot about them, except who awards them. I do cheer for people I know who are nominated for them and would love the ability to vote some day. :)

I love voting...but that also comes with a mandate to read more....which is tough sometimes!

Awards are not that meaningful to readers, but they are huge within the industry. Even though I've been publishing short fiction for fifteen years (!), and am networked out the wazoo (I went to Clarion, know everyone, friends with many famous people), I don't get asked to write stories for anthologies. Instead, writers with much less experience (and in some cases less skill IMHO) get bombarded with requests after they end up on an award ballot. Awards can make a big difference in landing and negotiating publishing contracts, they can make agents more likely to be interested in you, and they can get you on short lists for reprint anthologies and teaching gigs. (I know in some cases workshop organizers pretty much use award lists as a reference for recruiting instructors.) Awards are pretty capricious, but once you've been on the ballot or won and award, people are watching your work, automatically thinking of you for the next one. Awards are nothing to sneeze at.

On the other hand, newbies in the genre often overestimate the significance of an award. Considering the number that are given out, a large proportion of sff writers have won awards. It's another rung on the ladder, but it doesn't put you at the top.

That is completely true. I will say that before the Nebulas, I was getting nowhere with agents. Afterwards, I got requests from the same agents. Now admittedly, I was only querying a few people (4), but still...

It's another rung on the ladder, but it doesn't put you at the top.
So true!

i was happy as a pig in slop when my anthology made the preliminary stoker for 2009. everybody was like, "prelims don't mean anything", but it meant the world to me.

I am very torn about awards. I do want one! But I have to say that 75% of the time, I don't like the book in question.

I do agree. I suspect that many awards have more than one motive in the selection of the winner. Also, I think I've seen a delayed effect in the Hugo sometimes....as if the readers are miffed that BigAuthor didn't get the award for Bestselling Book X, so they vote for Book Y, even if it's not as good.

FWIW, I have NO evidence to back that up.

Edited at 2013-01-22 06:37 pm (UTC)

I don't want to be jaded about certain awards of which we are both familiar, but it often seems a bit more cliquish than I am comfortable with.

I can understand that sentiment...

I'm one of those readers who doesn't know anything about awards, so they don't really affect my buying habits, I don't think...

I suspect marketing research people have spent millions to figure out just what sells to the masses on a cover. How much are we falling for? Hard to tell!

I took two attempts to get through Downbelow Station, but when I got into it the second time, I was seriously hooked. She's one of my favourite writers- my historical fiction is inspired by her Union-Alliance series, of all bizarre things.

And my last embarrassing afterword... Years ago I won a short story competition at a local science fiction convention. C J Cherryh gave me my prize, and appeared on the same writers panel as myself.

I hadn't read a word of her writing then, and then, out of interest, I bought Pride of CHanur, and I was soon hooked...

Downbelow Station is one of those books that has so much going on that there's a ton of buildup....I just stopped right before the inertia to caught up to it.

You can't be responsible for reading every author out there ;o) It's just impossible!

I think one of the things I love most about her science fiction works is the way that there's no sense of black and white, just shades of grey, in the Union-Alliance universe. A character who comes across as a right b*****d in one book is sympathetically treated in another, because we see their point-of-view, Signy Mallory being a case in point...

True. I never liked her, but she was admirable in many ways...

Hah! I think I had the same thing happen with me on Downbelow Station! It just seemed like it wasn’t going anywhere fast. Sadly, I don’t think I ever picked it back up.

I have recently re-read the Chanur series—I can recall being somewhere between 15 and 17 and reading the second book and wondering just when they were going to leave the station and get on with things, only realizing very late that the leaving of the station was the main part of the book!

Like you, back during my non-writer days I was only vaguely aware of the contests, but I seem to recall thinking that the Hugo was a fairly big deal.

As to awards, I don’t think I could tell you what they are for—and I made notes and everything on it! I just don’t think about it that much. Let me see what I get, just shooting from the hip:

Campbell: Best new sf book.

Sturgeon: Best new sf short-story

Hugo: Best new… sf book by a new writer…

Nebula: Uh… best sf short story by a new writer…

Then there is the Writers of the Future, which is best SF/F short (maybe up to novella) of the year by a non-professional author.

Of course, different people and juries and groups are voting for each of these, so there may be some overlap.

Well, the Hugos and the Nebulas (and WFC awards, which I left out) have several categories, so they're not just one novel or story. Each one includes several awards.

And those are just the tip of the iceberg for possible awards.

You are viewing j_cheney